Skip to content
DEList a propertyFind a property
Shortlist

Living · Topic

Where is St. Pölten greenest to live?

St. Pölten is greenest in Unterradlberg, Viehofen and Harland.

“Green” is easy to claim. wohnwahn measures it: the proximity to real green spaces, parks, woods and meadows, for every inhabited 250 m cell.

And the district average deceives, here in both directions: the centre has the highest share of green space in the city and its homes still only reach mid-table, while out in the countryside the houses sit at the edge of the woods although the municipal area is almost all farmland. wohnwahn measures the green at your home, not at the district’s rim.

St. Pölten’s greenest districts

Ranked by the median green-space proximity of inhabited residential cells, so the green that people actually live next to. Linked: the full district profile in the atlas.

  1. 1Unterradlberg85green score
  2. 2Viehofen73green score
  3. 3Harland63green score

Green-space proximity (parks, woods, meadows) per 250 m cell, from OpenStreetMap · as of: October 2026

  1. 4
    Ratzersdorf an der Traisen
    per spot 35–82· Rathausplatz ≈ 13 Min
    59green score
  2. 5
    St. Georgen am Steinfelde
    per spot 1–66· Rathausplatz ≈ 21 Min
    45green score
  3. 6
    Zentrum
    per spot 10–60· Rathausplatz ≈ 11 Min
    44green score
  4. 7
    Spratzern
    per spot 6–66· Rathausplatz ≈ 15 Min
    40green score
  5. 8
    Stattersdorf
    per spot 28–51· Rathausplatz ≈ 14 Min
    38green score
  6. 9
    Unterwagram
    per spot 13–64· Rathausplatz ≈ 8 Min
    33green score
  7. 10
    Oberwagram
    per spot 7–51· Rathausplatz ≈ 8 Min
    30green score
  8. 11
    Pottenbrunn
    per spot 1–48· Rathausplatz ≈ 16 Min
    24green score
  9. 12
    Teufelhof
    per spot 10–39· Rathausplatz ≈ 11 Min
    23green score
  10. 13
    Neu-Hart
    per spot 0–28· Rathausplatz ≈ 18 Min
    0green score

Method: proximity to real green spaces (parks, woods, meadows from OpenStreetMap) per inhabited 250 m cell, bigger and closer green weighs more, clipped to the real district boundary. Deliberately NOT the district green-area percentage that the usual rankings use: that figure is inflated by woods, fields and floodplain at the unbuilt edge and says nothing about where people live. The number next to each district is the median street-tree count as extra context.

Homes in the green

No green listings online right now.

Save a search with the “lots of green” filter and we’ll email you when a matching home comes in.

Open the searchList a property (free)

The green map of St. Pölten

Dark green means a lot of park, woodland or meadow nearby. Every square is an inhabited 250 m cell with its green-space proximity score (bigger and closer green counts more).

sparseleafy

Only inhabited cells are coloured. This measures proximity to green spaces per home. Tap the map for the green score at that exact spot.

Green and still central

Green usually means the edge of town. These districts prove you can have both: a high green score AND within 25 minutes of Rathausplatz by transit.

How to find a genuinely green flat

Green also means cooler

Street trees measurably cool their surroundings in summer. If you care about heat, green and cool go together, the cool-living page maps the heat load next to the green.

Frequently asked questions

Which is the greenest district in St. Pölten?

By green-space proximity it is Unterradlberg: the typical home there scores 85/100 for nearby parks, woods and meadows, ahead of Viehofen and Harland. Source: OpenStreetMap green spaces, evaluated per 250 m cell.

Does a lot of green space make a district green to live in?

In St. Pölten the green-area percentage misleads in both directions: the centre has the highest share of green space in the city and its homes still only reach mid-table, while the surrounding municipalities are almost all farmland on paper and offer the greenest homes in the market, because the houses there sit at the edge of the woods. That number says nothing about the green next to your home. wohnwahn instead measures the green space within walking distance of each inhabited spot, so a densely built block in a “green” district shows up honestly as what it is.

Do parks and woods count, or only street trees?

The ranking is built on real green spaces, parks, woods and meadows within walking distance, which is what most people mean by “living green”.

Where do you live green AND close to the centre?

Harland for example: a high green score and still ≈ 15 minutes from Rathausplatz by transit. Green and central is rarer than green-and-far, but the data shows where the combination exists.

Do street trees really make a difference?

Yes, measurably: trees provide shade and evaporative cooling and improve air and well-being. That’s why wohnwahn shows the trees around every address and why green overlaps with the cool-living ranking.

How current is the green data?

Green spaces from OpenStreetMap, evaluated per inhabited 250 m cell, refreshed monthly (as of October 2026).

More honest data on where to live well in St. Pölten and the surrounding area.

This topic inViennaGrazSalzburgLinzInnsbruckBregenzKlagenfurtEisenstadt

Find a green home, honestly.

Use the “lots of green” filter, tap any address on the map, and see the trees, water, heat and travel times before the viewing. Free and independent.

Search green homes →

Sources: green spaces: OpenStreetMap · transit: own routing on the LUP St. Pölten and ÖBB timetables. Refreshed monthly.